Comments on: Titanic Search Was Secret Military Cover Up

By: Aisleyne Horgan Wallace

Aisleyne Horgan Wallace — Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:15:02 +0000

@TSHxReaper nop. i know

By: Roger

Roger — Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:58:39 +0000

The History Channel recently aired a program called vanishings. It had some pretty good footage of the wreckage. I am a former submariner having experience with boomers and fast attacks. A couple of things got my attention. 1. the retractable cleat in the bow photo is in the up position, that is only up when line handling. 2 the bow hatch is open, in the documentary footage, no distortion of the hatch or locking ring. I don’t know many submarines that operate submerged the an escape hatch open?

By: wkel52

wkel52 — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 01:29:08 +0000

yes he did i read a book on it thats when he went down and looked through it

By: Ron

Ron — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 06:08:17 +0000

The torpedoe theory is bogus. Anyone who sees the subs sail will see a section is missing and is blown away totally. At least
200 sq feet of the sail is gone and one can see something hit it as there is a gouge where the periscopes are bent.

By: John

John — Fri, 30 May 2008 11:28:28 +0000

Ballard found the wreck of the Titanic in 1985, not 1995.

By: Rich

Rich — Wed, 28 May 2008 10:00:32 +0000

I guess he had this planned out. As soon as his confidentiality agreement expired he launched his book. I have not seen that book yet, but I know that Discovery Channel is working on a series about his experience as well.

By: Richard Zeting

Richard Zeting — Wed, 28 May 2008 02:19:23 +0000

I just read a new book called All Hands Down by Jerome Preisler and Ken Sewell that re-enacts the Ballard Titanic/Scorpion dives and was very exciting. It took you aboard the Alvin, and then tells the story of the submarine’s crew and how they were trapped by the Russians.