Comments on: Top 5 High Tech Infantry Guns

By: Jeff

Jeff — Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:23:28 +0000

The M-16 received a poor reputation in its early days because the Army kept using the same propellant in its ammo as for the M-14. Eugene Stoner knew this would cause problems. Once the propellant was changed to the designers specs, no more problem The M-16 is a good weapon, and probably the longest lived issue combat rifle by this point… We trained on A1s back in the ’90s, The good old days!

By: P1FF

P1FF — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 05:50:33 +0000

You realize that you’re implying that the FMG9 is an INFANTRY gun right? Might want to look up what an infantry weapon is before writing an article like this haha.

By: fresh

fresh — Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:20:27 +0000

MUSKET FTW

By: JubJub

JubJub — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:40:15 +0000

Why does no-one want tha Sar-21? That is infact my 3rd favourite weapon of all time!

By: Rich

Rich — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:23:12 +0000

Definitely! Actually, I think it deserves its own post – Coming Soon!

By: TG

TG — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:27:50 +0000

NO LIST OF FUTUREWEAPONS IS COMPLETE WITHOUT THE AA12. LOOK IT UP. AUTO SHOTGUN W/ GRENADE ROUNDS. HELLO 21st CENTURY

By: Ben

Ben — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 06:16:23 +0000

Its funny that the first m16 in nam have ruined the m16′s name forever.

By: Adjutor

Adjutor — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:28:51 +0000

Magpul stated that they had no intention of manufacturing that folding submachine gun. The reason they decided to create it was to demonstrate that they had the capability to create useful products. It was a marketing ploy.

As for the SCAR, it isn’t being used because it is an unnecessary expense. The M16 family of rifles is a perfectly good platform. People constantly talk about it jamming, as though that is a real problem. The troops love those weapons. They are easy to use, reliable, and effective weapons. This is why they AR-15 is such a popular civilian weapon.